10-15-2022, 06:53 PM
(10-15-2022, 06:22 PM)hakeemfaan Wrote: Everyone dwarfs in front of Balmer. However Cuban is more in the middle than at the bottom in terms of net worth of NBA owners. However in terms of taking risks he is now most probably at the bottom. Sure he will pay for a Luka or a Porzingis ( most teams would have ) but in general there is too much paralysis by analysis than taking bold decisions that a younger Cuban might have.
The fan base engaging in discussions on how to make the cap more equitable is making excuses and ignoring the fact that Cuban is still a very wealthy and relevant owner who just has gone into a shell post that championship or maybe post the Parsons fiasco. Let’s not forget again how the Warriors got Wiggins. They took a chance on DAngelo knowing he didn’t fit but being smart enough to know that they were getting an asset they could flip. The Mavs don’t do those types of things and even if they did get someone like DAmgelo, they would have been fleeced in a trade when trying to flip him with the fan base making the same excuse that no one would have given up anything for a player like that.
My point was the eventually Balmer will be dwarfed.
I do agree with your analysis about how the Mavs operate though. I always get a kick out of how this board, me included, overanalyze fit especially with the state of the end of our rotation and end of our bench.
![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)