01-15-2023, 11:50 PM
(01-15-2023, 11:46 PM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: Are you under the mistaken impression they ‘gave’ him a no-trade clause or did you want them to sign him for two years. His right to veto comes from signing a one year deal that ends with Bird or EB rights. Nothing more.
Nope, I'm of the opinion that having him on the roster in the first place is suspect and that allowing him to be on the roster in such a way that he gets any say in his future, even on a technicality, is doubly suspect.
I would not have gone that way, and no, I didn't think they "gave" it to him. I still think it's idiotic.