Home › Boards › Dallas Mavericks and the NBA v
PLAYOFF WCF GAME 3: GSW (3-0) vs. DAL (0-3) | 100-109 loss

Poll: Do the Mavs finally have a good defensive game against the Warriors? O/U Warriors FG%- 43.5
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Over
80.00%
 4 80.00%
Under
20.00%
 1 20.00%
Total 5 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
PLAYOFF WCF GAME 3: GSW (3-0) vs. DAL (0-3) | 100-109 loss
mvossman Offline
Franchise Player
*****
Posts: 3,615
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 2,941 in 1,572 posts
Likes Given: 2,265
Likes Received: 2,941 in 1,572 posts
Likes Given: 2,265
Joined: Dec 2020
#175
05-23-2022, 02:51 PM
(05-23-2022, 02:27 PM)sefant Wrote: Utah would literally ask for Brunson/DFS/Bullock (2 out of 3), thats the problem. If he was available for a Bertans/THJ/SD package, sure. Are we a better team without DFS/Bullock? If you add Gobert.

Utah is awful on defense, they want 3/D guys.

Then you don't pull the trigger.  I seriously doubt anyone is going to give them that kind of package for that monstrous contract, but if it takes something like that then you walk.  They may just be looking for expiring/tradeable contracts and picks.
Find
Like Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: PLAYOFF WCF GAME 3: GSW (3-0) vs. DAL (0-3) | 100-109 loss - by mvossman - 05-23-2022, 02:51 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 4 Guest(s)