SleepingHero > 05-05-2022, 01:47 PM
michaeltex > 05-05-2022, 02:31 PM
Mavs2021 > 05-05-2022, 02:42 PM
cow > 05-05-2022, 02:56 PM
Chicagojk > 05-05-2022, 03:13 PM
mvossman > 05-05-2022, 03:44 PM
(05-05-2022, 02:56 PM)cow Wrote: I think Luka can probably drag just about any roster construction to the playoffs. The biggest success for this organization was how they played against Utah with Luka sidelined.
I'd still hesitate to call the season a success as that seems like an incredibly low standard. Maybe you'd re-evaluate that if you didn't have a generational talent on your team. It doesn't feel like we are any closer to a championship team than in the previous two seasons and I'm not sure this team beats the those Clippers teams. The roster isn't likely to change very much either.
cow > 05-05-2022, 03:55 PM
(05-05-2022, 03:44 PM)mvossman Wrote: If you were of the opinion that this team was never going to win a championship with KP, and that dumping him was a necessary step back in order to move forward, then this season was clearly a success.
vfromlmf > 05-05-2022, 04:07 PM
mvossman > 05-05-2022, 04:17 PM
(05-05-2022, 03:55 PM)cow Wrote: You kicked the KP can down the road a bit though. Assuming he opts in, KP expires in '23-34. Assuming we keep Dinwiddie, he expires in '23-24. Bertans expires in '24-25. You are probably locked into Bertans contract unless you kick the can further down the road by giving up assets to dump him. You can argue the merits of Dinwiddie versus KP and I'd probably be in favor of Dinwiddie before the playoffs but if you factor in playoff performance, it's a wash. We still owe picks for trading for and trading away KP. I wouldn't call anything about the KP situation a success at this point.
cow > 05-05-2022, 04:27 PM
(05-05-2022, 04:17 PM)mvossman Wrote: I think you are missing the point. I am not arguing anything positive regarding KP including the trade to dump him (which I thought was poor timing and we gave up too much). My argument is that we knew we were going to lose overall talent when dumping KP and yet we still outperformed last year. Add in losing THJ for the year (which I think was a hit) and it is more impressive.
khaled1987 > 05-05-2022, 04:44 PM
omahen > 05-05-2022, 06:36 PM
Mavs2021 > 05-05-2022, 11:42 PM
(05-05-2022, 06:36 PM)omahen Wrote: Since days of cap space are gone for several years to come and since draft picks will likely have low probability to add significant talent, trades are the only realistic way to make that happen.
cow > 05-05-2022, 11:53 PM
(05-05-2022, 11:42 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: Sorry I pick out this one line out of a quality post, but this whole trades are the best and only way, so we got
Luka drafted
Brunson drafted
DFS undrafted free agent
Kleber undrafted free agent
Bullock free agent
then we have
overpaying Powell from a failed Rondo trade, losing drafted Crowder and picks in the process
overpaying THJ + Burke acquiring overpaid Dinwiddie + Bertans from a failed Porzingis trade and losing picks in the process
losing Seth Curry for Josh Richardson, after getting rid, overall once again losing picks in the process
S&T Delon Wright, after getting rid, once again losing many picks in the process
Given that we have pissed away draft picks for fun and negatively sabotaged our draft positions every year, one might even come to the conclusion that we are actually better at drafting than trading, cause I don´t see anybody we acquired in a real trade for the last decade that is a major contributor on a value contract. And the saddest part is that in every single trade we were the buyer. We didn´t get anything from the trades (okay the Seth trade in stage I, which we then paid back double in stage II).
This team is awful at every phase of asset management (drafting, trading, free agency). There is no other way to arrive at this point and the difference between the Mavs and franchises like the Kings or Magic for the last decade is one moment of enlightenment, when they picked the best young player in the world.
omahen > 05-06-2022, 01:45 AM
(05-05-2022, 11:42 PM)Mavs2021 Wrote: This team is awful at every phase of asset management (drafting, trading, free agency). There is no other way to arrive at this point and the difference between the Mavs and franchises like the Kings or Magic for the last decade is one moment of enlightenment, when they picked the best young player in the world.
SleepingHero > 05-06-2022, 09:00 AM
(05-05-2022, 06:36 PM)omahen Wrote: I expect Mavs to remain ambitious, but the jury is out if the new FO will actually be able to first create (convince player he wants to be in Dallas) and later execute a deal. Are we finally going to see some serious upgrade of the talent level? Doesn't have to be top tier player, just a solid two way player capable of playing defense and creating for himself. Or will we just be entitled to read how Mavs want to bring (for example) Lillard who will be traded to team X of his choosing a week or two later? Again...
omahen > 05-06-2022, 09:53 AM
(05-06-2022, 09:00 AM)SleepingHero Wrote: I do think you're underplaying the pick protections. The Mavs on paper do have only 1 pick owed the next 8 years, but that 1 pick cancels out 3 others (2022 and 2024 and 2025) till it's conveyed. So in reality the Mavs have 2 picks they use till 2023 draft.
ThisIStheYear > 05-07-2022, 08:58 AM
Jommybone > 05-07-2022, 04:37 PM
loki > 05-07-2022, 04:49 PM