01-24-2022, 06:48 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-24-2022, 06:49 PM by KillerLeft.)
(01-24-2022, 06:41 PM)ItsGoTime Wrote: If we were to get RoCo, Bullock would fit next to him just fine as the 3. In other words, DFS isn't as irreplaceable as you're making him out to be.
Everyone is replaceable. Bullock CAN be played at the 3.
I don't think he'd do it anywhere remotely close to as well as DFS. Like, not even close. DFS plays so much bigger than Bullock. He's probably the best rebounder on the team, imo.
I wouldn't do that, but I think Bullock/Covington/KP would be a lot better than the Covington/Ingrim/KP lineup we were discussing, for context.
I'm not trying to invent a position, I'm trying to illustrate the differences I see in the players we're discussing. I think DFS is a significantly better player than Bullock, personally, and that's completely leaving position or fit out of it.
Nobody is asking you to agree, you stone-hearted DFS hater!
(01-24-2022, 06:45 PM)omahen Wrote: I just don't see a fresh GM admitting that his "prize signing" of his first season as a GM was a collossal mistake that needs to be dumped for nothing. That is some seriously bad cap management.
Yeah, it would be awful - I'm with you.
But MORE awful than having to let DFS or Brunson go??
There are levels to awful, you know?
Maybe they'll just pay the tax, who knows.