I'm not a fan of either party, but my take is that there is a lot of insinuation about motive in this lawsuit ("He offered me 66 M because he 'wanted to hush me up' kind of stuff). I mean how do you prove someone's motive for a contract extension?
Cuban says there already was an investigation, but that sounds pretty vague as well. Who did the investigation? If the NBA has already investigated, then this should be an easy call. Who was paid for what?
It seems to me the real issue is whether there was sexual misconduct and if it needed to be exposed. Yet it doesn't really feel like that's what the lawsuit is about. It feels more like a vindictive exercise than any issue about someone actually being hurt. Are we supposed to think Donnie Nelson is the victim?
Cuban says there already was an investigation, but that sounds pretty vague as well. Who did the investigation? If the NBA has already investigated, then this should be an easy call. Who was paid for what?
It seems to me the real issue is whether there was sexual misconduct and if it needed to be exposed. Yet it doesn't really feel like that's what the lawsuit is about. It feels more like a vindictive exercise than any issue about someone actually being hurt. Are we supposed to think Donnie Nelson is the victim?
![[-]](https://www.mavsboard.com/images/collapse.png)