08-30-2021, 12:25 PM
(08-30-2021, 12:10 PM)SleepingHero Wrote: The Mavs deserved a C+. In fact I'd venture to say they should get a C-. But the Lakers getting a B+ for adding Westbrook and the retirement home of stars past? Bulls getting a B after totally turning around their roster? Portland getting a B for doing largely what the Mavs did?? It doesn't make sense and shows that Bleacher Report doesn't care about quality. That was my issue.
We can argue all we want about what grade these teams truly deserve, but I know for certain the grades the author assigned are false and lazy reporting.
Westbrook, Nunn, Monk, Bazemore, Ariza, THT, Howard, Anthony, THT. Lakers got A LOT better, without any money to do so. Meanwhile we got little to no better, with A LOT of money to work with.
POR has arguably 5-6 guys who would start and be our 3rd best player here.
I agree our grade should be worse.