08-05-2021, 04:13 PM
(08-05-2021, 03:26 PM)fifteenth Wrote: Yeah, I haven't thought this was about "because Luka will be VERY unhappy". If you doubt that motive, then I'm there with you.Yes, that makes more sense, if I understand what you're saying.
Also, I'm not in the camp that would say the Mavs must get Dragic "whatever it costs". And I think the idea that "not Dragic" would be attached to "failure" is because it looks like "not Dragic" might mean that the Mavs are done updating the roster. So the failure would be settling for just Bullock/Brown/Moses as the offseason get.
It's the failure to get a new secondary playmaker at all, rather than a failure to get Dragic in particular.