Posts: 4,105
Threads: 13
Likes Received: 4,086 in 1,495 posts
Likes Given: 2,097
Likes Received: 4,086 in 1,495 posts
Likes Given: 2,097
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 09:59 AM)vfromlmf Wrote: I reserve the right to change my mind but for me, the shine is wearing off Christian Wood.
I think this is a good way to put it...the shine is wearing off. He's not trash, but he's not special either. He teases enough ability that you want to invest in him hoping he's the guy you think you see in those moments. He's not a center and it takes a very specific kind of center to allow Wood to start at PF and get the most out of him. I'm not sure who else Wood would start for across the league (Charlotte? Does Indy take him over Jalen Smith? Miami? NY?). The fact it is discussed so much here is more of indictment against Dallas than an endorsement of Wood.
Posts: 3,747
Threads: 0
Likes Received: 3,062 in 1,634 posts
Likes Given: 2,342
Likes Received: 3,062 in 1,634 posts
Likes Given: 2,342
Joined: Dec 2020
(12-02-2022, 10:18 AM)Kammrath Wrote: Kidd has absolutely succeeded.
Is this a bit, or do you think Kidd is intentionally tanking Wood's value?
Posts: 15,491
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Joined: Aug 2020
(12-02-2022, 10:34 AM)DanSchwartzgan Wrote: He's not a center
Yes, he is. I'm more sure of this with each passing game.
What he's NOT is a forward.
Posts: 8,270
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 4,311 in 2,324 posts
Likes Given: 1,169
Likes Received: 4,311 in 2,324 posts
Likes Given: 1,169
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 12:23 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Yes, he is. I'm more sure of this with each passing game.
What he's NOT is a forward.
He´s neither and that´s the problem. On offense you want him to play center because that unleashes his full potential. He can face up and take slower guys of the dribble. He can roll and pop. If needed he can post up.
But on defense he really doesn´t have a position in the modern NBA. Not a traditional center. No rim protection and no boxouts. Bad pick and roll defense. But moving him to the perimeter isn´t possible because he cannot stay in front of guards/wings. Not suited for the McGee role. Also not able to play a Powell/Kleber-like role.
Undeniable a really talented scorer but it´s difficult to find a role for him.
Posts: 15,491
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Joined: Aug 2020
(12-02-2022, 12:51 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: He´s neither and that´s the problem. On offense you want him to play center because that unleashes his full potential. He can face up and take slower guys of the dribble. He can roll and pop. If needed he can post up.
But on defense he really doesn´t have a position in the modern NBA. Not a traditional center. No rim protection and no boxouts. Bad pick and roll defense. But moving him to the perimeter isn´t possible because he cannot stay in front of guards/wings. Not suited for the McGee role. Also not able to play a Powell/Kleber-like role.
Undeniable a really talented scorer but it´s difficult to find a role for him.
I agree with this, kind of. Would push back on the "traditional center" because to me, nowadays, that's just a way of saying "bad player." But I know you're not guilty of thinking the way most people do when they use that term...I just think you're in a slightly different spot than me on that spectrum.
As for the rest...the logic with Wood for me looks like this:
Wood at Forward: instincts aren't right on either end, severely lacking in foot speed on defense, can't really box out quicker players, so rebounding (which can be a strength of his) becomes even worse as a result of him playing, offensive skill seems forced, out of place and not at all to his strengths or the team's.
Wood at Center: instincts much more natural, even if not always to winning effect. Defense is still a problem but no more so than at forward, and at least there's hope for improvement because it's ALL mental at the 5. His speed, quickness and size are more than sufficient to play defense that position (and NOT sufficient to defend at forward). Offensively, he's "special" at that position when going well, and if/when he becomes consistent, both individually and when it comes to operating within the scheme, I'd say he might be a top 5 offensive center in the league.
To me, this shouldn't even be a conversation. He flatly does NOT have potential to be a difference maker at forward. He'll always be overmatched, athletically.
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 12:07 PM)mvossman Wrote: Is this a bit, or do you think Kidd is intentionally tanking Wood's value?
MacMahon reported that Kidd has been trying to "break" Wood so that he does not think of himself as a "star." I think Kidd has broken him. He has lost his confidence and swagger for the most part and looks scared and hesitant on the floor. Wood looks like his soul has been swallowed and it has absolutely hurt his play on both ends.
Maybe Kidd is right and this is the best long term thing to do. But I fundamentally disagree with how Kidd has handled Wood. The Mavs desperately need confidence, swagger, and "star" like thinking alongside Luka. And he took the one guy with that on the team and is crushing it out of him.
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
RE: Wood's Position
I frankly do not care. He is a basketball player and he has talent and athletic ability. A good coach IMO would nurture that and just figure out a way to make it work, putting whatever combination of players next to Luka and Wood to make it work.
I think how Kidd is USING Wood is the whole issue and the position issue wouldn't be a thing unless Kidd were forcing Wood to play a "position" within his scheme. But yes Wood does not clearly fit a position in how KIDD envisions the positions in his system.
Posts: 15,491
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Joined: Aug 2020
(12-02-2022, 01:16 PM)Kammrath Wrote: I think how Kidd is USING Wood is the whole issue and the position issue wouldn't be a thing unless Kidd were forcing Wood to play a "position" within his scheme. But yes Wood does not clearly fit a position in how KIDD envisions the positions in his system.
I get where you're coming from with this, trust me. On a purely macro level I totally agree. The thing is, "system" is absolutely necessary in order to get 15 people to coordinate their efforts toward a common goal, organizationally, and it's much harder than we think to completely redesign that stuff on the fly, even in (one) training camp.
The things I've seen you begging for, regarding making Luka/Wood two-man the centerpiece of the offense system sort of require him to be played at the 5, imho, because it requires certain defenders to be in place opposing it to reach full effect. There aren't very many teams playing two bigs anymore, so the days of 1-4 pick and roll are kind of behind us (for now).
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 01:26 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: making Luka/Wood two-man the centerpiece of the offense system sort of require him to be played at the 5
Then play him at the "5." Or play him at the "4" if you figure out a way to do that.
All I care about: Play your damn talent!
Watching the Mavs play Detroit last night was just another reminder of how little talent the Mavs have. SO LITTLE TALENT. And Wood is one of the only bright spots on that front.
Posts: 8,270
Threads: 11
Likes Received: 4,311 in 2,324 posts
Likes Given: 1,169
Likes Received: 4,311 in 2,324 posts
Likes Given: 1,169
Joined: Sep 2019
My problem isn´t that Kidd doesn´t trust Wood on defense. I think that is totally reasonable. My problem is the inconsistency. If it is all about defense what are THJ, SD and Bullock doing on the floor. They are just as bad. Maybe even worse.
Just feels like there is some kind of double standard. Listening to Kidd´s post game interviews he likes to single out Wood. Not suprised that a number of posters think that he is trying to prove a point. Question is who he is adressing. What´s going on behind the scenes?
Posts: 15,491
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Joined: Aug 2020
(12-02-2022, 01:32 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Then play him at the "5." Or play him at the "4" if you figure out a way to do that.
All I care about: Play your damn talent!
Watching the Mavs play Detroit last night was just another reminder of how little talent the Mavs have. SO LITTLE TALENT. And Wood is one of the only bright spots on that front.
Yes, on a team this in need of offensive creation, finding a way for a 6'10" guy who can shoot, handle the ball, create space for a wide variety of scoring attempts, post up, roll hard, make second passes out of the short roll, etc, etc, etc to fit in and contribute as much as possible is a necessity, not just a goal.
Right there with you.
Posts: 2,672
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 2,663 in 1,166 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Likes Received: 2,663 in 1,166 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Joined: Nov 2020
(12-02-2022, 01:32 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Then play him at the "5." Or play him at the "4" if you figure out a way to do that.
All I care about: Play your damn talent!
Watching the Mavs play Detroit last night was just another reminder of how little talent the Mavs have. SO LITTLE TALENT. And Wood is one of the only bright spots on that front.
I agree that you cater to your dominant talent. But I disagree that Wood is that guy. The Mavs' challenge is figuring out HOW to use him in a way where his strengths are going to reliably help the team more than his flaws will hurt them, and in a 5-on-5 game with team dynamics, that's not as simplistic as you keep trying to make it.
Posts: 15,491
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Joined: Aug 2020
(12-02-2022, 01:52 PM)F Gump Wrote: I agree that you cater to your dominant talent. But I disagree that Wood is that guy. The Mavs' challenge is figuring out HOW to use him in a way where his strengths are going to reliably help the team more than his flaws will hurt them, and in a 5-on-5 game with team dynamics, that's not as simplistic as you keep trying to make it.
Yes. You are correct, obviously.
BUT, to Kamm's point, this team really needs to make him work, imo. If we were talking about a team that's working, a well-oiled machine, I'd be fine with the whole "he's you're chance, take it or leave it" approach. But it's hard not to view Wood and some of the things he can clearly do as lifelines to a team desperate for offensive talent.
Posts: 2,672
Threads: 6
Likes Received: 2,663 in 1,166 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Likes Received: 2,663 in 1,166 posts
Likes Given: 2,129
Joined: Nov 2020
(12-02-2022, 01:37 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Listening to Kidd´s post game interviews he likes to single out Wood. Not suprised that a number of posters think that he is trying to prove a point. Question is who he is adressing. What´s going on behind the scenes?
Kidd answers what he's asked, so when the questions focus on Wood to an higher degree, so do his replies. And at times, with that being the ongoing pattern, he's going to offer Wood-related commentary in anticipation of the questions. It's not any more mysterious than that.
Posts: 1,751
Threads: 2
Likes Received: 1,074 in 610 posts
Likes Given: 1,119
Likes Received: 1,074 in 610 posts
Likes Given: 1,119
Joined: Mar 2021
(12-02-2022, 01:58 PM)F Gump Wrote: Kidd answers what he's asked, so when the questions focus on Wood to an higher degree, so do his replies. And at times, with that being the ongoing pattern, he's going to offer Wood-related commentary in anticipation of the questions. It's not any more mysterious than that.
I understand that but there's also subtle jabs that are pretty obvious and not really solicited. The comments about the 3rd quarter in the Boston game come to mind.
Posts: 9,168
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 3,368 in 2,004 posts
Likes Given: 355
Likes Received: 3,368 in 2,004 posts
Likes Given: 355
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 01:56 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Yes. You are correct, obviously.
BUT, to Kamm's point, this team really needs to make him work, imo. If we were talking about a team that's working, a well-oiled machine, I'd be fine with the whole "he's you're chance, take it or leave it" approach. But it's hard not to view Wood and some of the things he can clearly do as lifelines to a team desperate for offensive talent.
I think fans are desperate for Wood to be that guy. He's shown flashes. He's had horrible outings. He's bounced around the league for a reason and was a very cheap rental for the MBT to acquire.
The following 1 user Likes cow's post:1 user Likes cow's post
• F Gump
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 02:03 PM)cow Wrote: He's had horrible outings.
Honestly not any more horrible than some of the guys who have been part of this team for YEARS. All players will have some ups and downs, especially as they acclimate to a new system.
Posts: 15,491
Threads: 52
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Likes Received: 7,798 in 4,253 posts
Likes Given: 9,534
Joined: Aug 2020
(12-02-2022, 02:03 PM)cow Wrote: I think fans are desperate for Wood to be that guy. He's shown flashes. He's had horrible outings. He's bounced around the league for a reason and was a very cheap rental for the MBT to acquire.
Oh, for sure we (fans) are. But, the team should be, too.
If he's not, then they wasted another summer and another first round pick. That's much, MUCH worse than hoping (foolishly, maybe) to make him work here.
Posts: 19,353
Threads: 619
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Likes Received: 4,455 in 2,760 posts
Likes Given: 1,941
Joined: Sep 2019
(12-02-2022, 02:09 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: wasted another summer and another first round pick
Posts: 9,168
Threads: 1
Likes Received: 3,368 in 2,004 posts
Likes Given: 355
Likes Received: 3,368 in 2,004 posts
Likes Given: 355
Joined: Sep 2019
12-02-2022, 02:14 PM
(This post was last modified: 12-02-2022, 02:17 PM by cow.)
(12-02-2022, 02:08 PM)Kammrath Wrote: Honestly not any more horrible than some of the guys who have been part of this team for YEARS. All players will have some ups and downs, especially as they acclimate to a new system.
Agree with the sentiment but I think a lot of people here think he is the savior and can turn this team around. I don't see it, no matter how great he plays. I thought our ceiling was probably to be as good as, yet different, than our team last year with JB and I just don't see that now.
I'd also be a little terrified to invest long term money in Wood, especially if Kidd is part of our future. I'd happily take him at his current number without Kidd, but giving him more money and keeping him with Kidd just seems like a THJ situation all over again.
If I'm the GM, I'm having Kidd invest more minutes into Green and some minutes into Hardy. Everyone is on the table except Luka.
(12-02-2022, 02:09 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Oh, for sure we (fans) are. But, the team should be, too.
If he's not, then they wasted another summer and another first round pick. That's much, MUCH worse than hoping (foolishly, maybe) to make him work here.
Summer? Sure. Giving 3 years to McGee was a mistake. First round pick? Not really. You paid a fair value to dump contracts (sins of the previous MBT) and somehow managed to get Wood in the deal. That's not working out but it's hard to complain about what they paid for him considering the contract dumps. If Wood was always at his best, there is no way you'd pay so little for him when guys like RoCo went for 2x FRPs. Not to mention that the MBT got their guy in Hardy.
|