11-12-2020, 10:44 PM
(11-12-2020, 10:26 PM)Scott41theMavs Wrote: Omahen, I think it was clear that KL was less making a claim than speaking rhetorically when he said WCS was 100% opting in, and I think that was clear to someone who wasn't being infantilely obtuse that he was offering to bet on WCS's return rather than the probability. You were stridently carping on his rhetoric instead of addressing his basic assertion with the bet invitation that it was more probable than not that WCS opts in. I suppose you could say that my own choice of words was to meet you on the level you were choosing to be at at the time.
Could you consider it was not me going after semantics with my "betting proposal" but I intentionally put it as I did to show a point? Now we cleared that up and the discussion is finished for me. I am not interested in betting, not this topic not any other.