01-02-2024, 06:45 PM
(This post was last modified: 01-02-2024, 06:47 PM by KillerLeft.)
Thinking you can just remove the ENTIRE ROLE of movement shooter out of the offense in the middle of the season because you feel like it is WILD, my friends.
The reason to trade for Harris (or anyone else) has NOTHING to do with Hardaway, from my POV. You do it if you want to use him to replace either Williams or DJJ. I can understand why people are into the idea of replacing Williams at this point. I stuck up with him for a while, but it's getting tough.
Putting Hardaway in the deal makes sense because you have Hardy and/or Curry to replace him. That's the Hardaway connection, along with the contract size.
Yes, that IS the question, and so many people are assuming the weirdest possible answer. I guess it's possible, but it makes almost no sense to me. That's why I haven't been on this warpath with everyone.
I think Williams/DJJ have potential!
The reason to trade for Harris (or anyone else) has NOTHING to do with Hardaway, from my POV. You do it if you want to use him to replace either Williams or DJJ. I can understand why people are into the idea of replacing Williams at this point. I stuck up with him for a while, but it's getting tough.
Putting Hardaway in the deal makes sense because you have Hardy and/or Curry to replace him. That's the Hardaway connection, along with the contract size.
(01-02-2024, 06:35 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: That's the role that I imagined but the question is if the Mavs would view him as a THJ replacement. Or if he would take minutes from DJJ/Williams.
Yes, that IS the question, and so many people are assuming the weirdest possible answer. I guess it's possible, but it makes almost no sense to me. That's why I haven't been on this warpath with everyone.
I think Williams/DJJ have potential!