11-22-2022, 05:46 PM
(11-22-2022, 05:04 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Sure, that's valid.
But, it's also not an occurrence that should remotely be rationalized as "unavoidable" and the negative impact of it can't be written off as it is done routinely here.
Agreed, and I definitely did not agree with the post you were replying to. Suggesting the Brunson is a JAG who got paid because of 3 playoff games sounds like sour grapes more than anything. But this organization has a fairly good record of holding onto guys that they want to hold onto. I think Brunson was a special case. The real mistakes were made earlier. The original contract (no restriction) and not offering the extension in the offseason.