09-15-2022, 07:34 AM
(09-15-2022, 01:05 AM)F Gump Wrote: you are actively trying to "spin" Cato's words ("Cuban remains involved in every decision") into something it's not. Please don't be so deliberately blind - clearly, Cato wouldn't have mentioned this if it was activity he sees as normal for an owner.
It's okay if you want to say/believe Cato's lying and you don't believe him. But let's not pretend here, as to the meaning he intended.
Unless you ARE Cato himself, then you cannot know the intentions of his words. I (and apparently another poster before me) think his intentions and meaning are ambiguous there.
I interpret them in the way the evidence seems to point from the big picture. You interpret them another way.
But "being involved in every decision" is not a clear statement and there are literally hundreds of ways in an organization that an owner could be "involved" in the decisions.
We have been factually told that Cuban signs the checks and approves of every decision that involves money. This is what we have been told and know for a fact his involvement is. It COULD be more (I grant you that), but we do not know for a fact what "involvement" looks like at this point.