01-27-2022, 03:08 AM
I guess we disagree.
I would probably gone with a 20M defensive player then. It's harder to be inconsistent at defense. 18M per for a streaky shooter that brings nothing else to the court...risky move. He only had 2 years of ok shooting of the 3 before he was paid...previous 6 years weren't that great. Maybe advanced stats show he kills it at open looks...I don't know...I'm going by basketball reference 3 numbers.
Anyway...a lot of money for few skills. And the big skill he had you aren't guaranteed consistency. I don't know. I think I pass to less of a known player with all around skills but not great at any one skill. But definitely know I would go for some sort if 2way player that wasn't "great". I'm sure there are lots of players under 18m per that are fairly consistent 2way players. Maybe they don't score 10 points a night...but offer consistent defense and can shoot or dribble fairly decent.
I'm assuming you will say those guys don't exist or something.
I would probably gone with a 20M defensive player then. It's harder to be inconsistent at defense. 18M per for a streaky shooter that brings nothing else to the court...risky move. He only had 2 years of ok shooting of the 3 before he was paid...previous 6 years weren't that great. Maybe advanced stats show he kills it at open looks...I don't know...I'm going by basketball reference 3 numbers.
Anyway...a lot of money for few skills. And the big skill he had you aren't guaranteed consistency. I don't know. I think I pass to less of a known player with all around skills but not great at any one skill. But definitely know I would go for some sort if 2way player that wasn't "great". I'm sure there are lots of players under 18m per that are fairly consistent 2way players. Maybe they don't score 10 points a night...but offer consistent defense and can shoot or dribble fairly decent.
I'm assuming you will say those guys don't exist or something.