2021-2022 ROSTER TALK: [ARCHIVED] - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: 2021-2022 ROSTER TALK: [ARCHIVED] (/showthread.php?tid=1100) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
|
RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - vfromlmf - 03-14-2022 Think we should hold our horses on fantasy trading THJ. 200 min: Luka + Brunson + Bullock + DFS + Powell = Net Rating 11.7 95 min: Luka + Brunson + THJ + DFS + Powell = Net Rating 12.3 Let's not forget THJ is a guy who can single handedly win a playoff game or two and the Mavs now have depth if he's not making shots. Personally I hope he makes it back for the postseason, especially if Bertans can't get his shooting on track. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - KillerLeft - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 02:56 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: Think we should hold our horses on fantasy trading THJ. Right there with you. Maybe it's just recency bias on my part (as in not recently seeing THJ brick 5 shots in a row like Bullock seems to love doing) but I'm pretty confident that THJ is the better overall player. Bullock is better defensively, but not as much better as the group think here declares daily, imho. The gap on offense is much wider, and in favor of THJ. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - StepBackJay - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 03:00 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Right there with you. I think Bullock plays winning basketball despite being a streaky shooter. Mavs are probably stuck with THJ for one more year so Mavs will prob find a use for him. I still don't think he will return to the starting lineup bc his defense is so terrible. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - Kammrath - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 03:00 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I'm pretty confident that THJ is the better overall player I don't like the streaky shooting we have seen from RB, but he is a positive on D almost every night regardless of how he is shooting. I take that over THJ every time. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - mvossman - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 04:39 PM)Kammrath Wrote: I'm with Killer on this one. THJ is the better player. Bullock is the better fit and his contract is almost half what THJ is, but a guy that can consistently get 15+ a game on decent efficiency (and didn't fall of in the playoffs either) is more valuable than a low volume 3&D guy who is not elite D. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - Chicagojk - 03-14-2022 Fitting in THJ is going to be tough. I would really liked to see him get into a groove like most of the other players have. He probably needs to adapt his game a little. We probably need him to be aggressive but not early possession 26 foot three aggressive. If he could find a role, having another guy who could go for 25 would be interesting. He really struggled with defense to start this year. Maybe he can get back to average? I wouldn't want to dump him for nothing though. I still think he is good player, when healthy. Him being engaged on the bench during injury makes me think we have written his Mavs obituary too soon. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - DanSchwartzgan - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 02:56 PM)vfromlmf Wrote: Think we should hold our horses on fantasy trading THJ. Interesting. I did the same thing subbing Maxi for Powell. The Bullock lineup had a net rating of 1.1. The THJ lineup is -24.4. Minutes are only 80 and 34, so Super Small Sample Size Alert. Your sample sizes are much more reasonable. To get a larger sample size, you can go to four-man lineups and put Luka, Brunson and DFS as three of the slots. Here is where people stand in terms of Net Rating as the fourth to that group in a four-man lineup: 484 Min. Powell 5.4 365 Min. Kleber 0.0 338 Min. Bullock 12.7 212 Min. THJ (1.6) 168 Min. KP (3.9) 55 Min. SD 17.2 41 Min. Green 25.3 If you change the date range to start at 12/31, Powell moves to 6.7, Maxi to 1.6, Bullock to 9.6, Hardaway to (5.0) in 11 games and 65 minutes and SD and Green are the same as all of their minutes in this group are since 12/31. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - Jason Terry - 03-14-2022 OKC: Hardaway DAL: Favors, two 2nds(not like they’ll have the roster spots anyway) OkC does it to get a vet role player for nearly free. We do it to 1.) save tax 2.) get a serviceable big 3.) get some minor trade chips RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - ItsGoTime - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 09:24 PM)Jason Terry Wrote: OKC: HardawayOKC doesn't need a shooter that can't shoot and Presti is pick hungry. Those seconds are going their way, not ours. Edit: However, I will say, Favors MIGHT be a decent compromise. I have wanted him since he fell out of favor in Utah, not sure he can be that guy again, but I would like to try and see if the price is right. Him Powell and Maxi sharing the C minutes would not be a bad thing IMO. He starts to put beef with beef, then they all get situational minutes. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - KillerLeft - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 06:33 PM)mvossman Wrote: a low volume 3&D guy who is not elite D. I like Bullock, don't get me wrong. But, this description is accurate, so far. I keep reading about how great he is defensively, but I'm not seeing it on the court. He's better than Hardaway at getting around screens - I'll give him that. But 1-on-1? I'm honestly not sure which of them is better, defensively. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - loki - 03-14-2022 Nic Claxton could be an interesting target for the taxpayer MLE. He's got all the physical tools to be the ideal switchable 5 in Kidd's system. Still pretty raw offensively, but he'll only be 23 next year. I'm not sure if Brooklyn would match a 20/3 offer or not. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - KillerLeft - 03-14-2022 IMHO, DFS, Green, Ntilikina, Kleber and Powell are the best defenders on this team. Bullock's level of play on that end is pretty much the same as Luka (when he's trying) Hardaway, Brown and even Burke. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - KillerLeft - 03-14-2022 Don't know who this Michael guy is, but he needs an account here if he doesn't have one already. https://twitter.com/mjk2341/status/1503207408230973442?s=20&t=7voxDzBs5D1YT22MQO2sIQ RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - sterlingmallory - 03-14-2022 (03-14-2022, 09:49 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: IMHO, DFS, Green, Ntilikina, Kleber and Powell are the best defenders on this team. Bullock's level of play on that end is pretty much the same as Luka (when he's trying) Hardaway, Brown and even Burke. Talk about a hot take. Come on, Bullock is definitely better than Luka, Hardaway, Brown and Burke on defense. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - Branduil - 03-15-2022 (03-11-2022, 03:08 PM)omahen Wrote: A good analysis as alwaysIt's an interesting analysis, although I'm not sure if it's particularly more useful than the usual "at least 2 stars" approach. In terms of volume scorers, Collins would definitely fit in that category very nicely. Not sure if he will be available or what Atlanta might want for him. Mavs could offer Bullock+Maxi+22 pick, which would greatly bolster their putrid defense, at least. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - Winter - 03-15-2022 The "3 and D" thing is vastly over-rated as a descriptive name. Most wings described as 3 and D are good 3-point shooters who are "adequate" or maybe pretty good defenders. If they shoot above average on 3s and can hold their own on defense, they get tagged with a "3 and D" label. Bullock is pretty solid, pretty smart, and has a reasonable contract. His 3-point shot has inched up. He knows where to be in this system. You don't trade him casually, and you probably aren't looking to trade him. He leaves only if some other team covets him in a package deal. I think if another team wants a wing, they are going to be asking for Green -unless they need Bullock's contract to meet the trade requirement. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - Smitty - 03-15-2022 (03-15-2022, 07:01 AM)Winter Wrote: The "3 and D" thing is vastly over-rated as a descriptive name. Most wings described as 3 and D are good 3-point shooters who are "adequate" or maybe pretty good defenders. If they shoot above average on 3s and can hold their own on defense, they get tagged with a "3 and D" label. Have you finally come around on Green?! RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - KillerLeft - 03-15-2022 (03-14-2022, 10:53 PM)sterlingmallory Wrote: Talk about a hot take. Come on, Bullock is definitely better than Luka, Hardaway, Brown and Burke on defense. Well, that's certainly what everyone says, anyway. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - mvossman - 03-15-2022 (03-14-2022, 09:49 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: IMHO, DFS, Green, Ntilikina, Kleber and Powell are the best defenders on this team. Bullock's level of play on that end is pretty much the same as Luka (when he's trying) Hardaway, Brown and even Burke. I would argue that our truly plus defenders are Maxi, DFS, Green and Frank Our truly minus defenders are Bertans, Hardaway and Brunson Bullock and Powell are probably on the high side of average. Luka and Din are probably on the low side. RE: ROSTER TALK: $10.87M TPE | DAL potential suitor for Mitchell Robinson? - KillerLeft - 03-15-2022 (03-15-2022, 10:29 AM)mvossman Wrote: I would argue that our truly plus defenders are Maxi, DFS, Green and Frank I can go with this, other than Bertans, Hardaway and Brunson. I don't think any one of them is nearly as bad on defense as people claim. I think Bertans has been good on defense, even. So far, at least. Obviously, this has been doled out in extremely small doses, which is fine - that's all he'll play, anyway. EDIT: Oh, and I think Powell is uncommonly good at defending the pick and roll from the 5 spot. Like, other teams are probably jealous of the Mavs about that. |