MavsBoard
Trade & FA 2023-24: Sexton On the Market? | ORL Likes Hartenstein? - Printable Version

+- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com)
+-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1)
+--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2)
+--- Thread: Trade & FA 2023-24: Sexton On the Market? | ORL Likes Hartenstein? (/showthread.php?tid=2444)

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578 579 580 581 582 583


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: PHX Wants Lebron+Bronny| Hawks to Shop Hunter - mvossman - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 12:47 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: I agree that they should take a hard look at someone like Hartenstein. 

The problem with that, however, and the reason that they didn’t pull the trigger on a big at the deadline (I think), is that in THEIR STYLE, Holmgren just isn’t a 4. I know many casual fans (not you) see a guy like Chet and immediately say “him skinny, him not center, him four” as they drool on their remotes, but a move in that direction would essentially turn them into the Timberwolves, and we just saw how that works. 

Now, part of WHY it hasn’t worked (yet) in Minnesota is that Gobert just doesn’t make an impact on the offensive side, whereas Hartenstein would, but…I honestly felt like Holmgren intimidated the Mavs in the paint on defense MORE than Gobert did in this series. I don’t think rim protection is the Thunder’s problem, like at all. I think they need a BACKUP center OPTION that isn’t Jalen Williams, for sure. I think you could make an argument that HE’s a 4, but even then, he’ll still need some time at center so they can run and play 5-out.

So, to me, it’s a hard target to hit. A guy who can play as a traditional big for extended minutes, but doesn’t expect the starting job to be gifted to him upon arrival. Ironically, I think Gafford might’ve been a better fit for them than the Mavericks. but, most of the names we know aren’t going to want to play third big minutes. After the year he just had, I would put Hartenstein on that list of people I would expect to be less than thrilled to go experiment in OKC.

So your proposing the Mavs send Gafford to OKC for one of their firsts (JK).


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Luka77 - 05-31-2024

My Mavs offseason
1. 6th man-Simons (White/Sexton), for THJ, Powell, Hardy, '25 first.  I may reconsider this based off of Hardy's readiness and production in the finals.

2. SF/PF-Vanderbilt for Maxi, 2 second round picks.  Mavs get younger and more offensively versatile player if he learns to shoot.

Kyrie/Simons
Luka/Green
DJJ/Omax
PJW/Vanderbilt
Gafford/Lively

That squad has multi year championship window.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - mvossman - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 02:40 PM)Luka77 Wrote: My Mavs offseason
1. 6th man-Simons (White/Sexton), for THJ, Powell, Hardy, '25 first.  I may reconsider this based off of Hardy's readiness and production in the finals.

2. SF/PF-Vanderbilt for Maxi, 2 second round picks.  Mavs get younger and more offensively versatile player if he learns to shoot.

Kyrie/Simons
Luka/Green
DJJ/Omax
PJW/Vanderbilt
Gafford/Lively

That squad has multi year championship window.

That is not going to be enough for Simons and probably not for Sexton either.  I don't know that we want to spend all of our assets and that much cap on a 6th man, and I seriously doubt either of those guys has any interest in being a 6th man.

There is little evidence that Vanderbilt will learn how to shoot.  He does most of his work at the rim.  Not sure he is a good fit offensively on this team.  I also doubt Lakers are interested in pairing oft injured Davis with oft injured Maxi.

My guess is that by next season Lively will be the first name on the center rotation.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Luka77 - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 03:57 PM)mvossman Wrote: That is not going to be enough for Simons and probably not for Sexton either.  I don't know that we want to spend all of our assets and that much cap on a 6th man, and I seriously doubt either of those guys has any interest in being a 6th man.

There is little evidence that Vanderbilt will learn how to shoot.  He does most of his work at the rim.  Not sure he is a good fit offensively on this team.  I also doubt Lakers are interested in pairing oft injured Davis with oft injured Maxi.

My guess is that by next season Lively will be the first name on the center rotation.

That team would be around for the next 5 years as they are all around Luka's timeline.  I think you spend the assets to get that done.  Moreover, those 3 players may only be a sixth man for the next two season.   After that time maybe a 34 y.o Kyrie will be okay with taking a back seat to become a sixth man.   Regardless, their desired role is something you talk about before the trade.  I'm thinking one of those guys would be willing to sacrifice to win a championship.

Also at what age did Dorian learn to shoot?  There was little evidence of him learning at 24 yo either.  I think it would worth taking a chance bc the Mavs would have four 6'6 to 6'8 defenders to throw at people like SGA, Ant, Tatum, Brown, ect. 

Maxi, who has two years less on contract, would be the salary to take on Vando.  The real assets would be the two seconds.  If LAL does truly want to get off Vando, I don't know if they could get better for a player I'm not sure is healthy himself.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - BigDirk41 - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 04:45 PM)Luka77 Wrote: That team would be around for the next 5 years as they are all around Luka's timeline.  I think you spend the assets to get that done.  Moreover, those 3 players may only be a sixth man for the next two season.   After that time maybe a 34 y.o Kyrie will be okay with taking a back seat to become a sixth man.   Regardless, their desired role is something you talk about before the trade.  I'm thinking one of those guys would be willing to sacrifice to win a championship.

Also at what age did Dorian learn to shoot?  There was little evidence of him learning at 24 yo either.  I think it would worth taking a chance at bc the Mavs would have four 6'6 to 6'8 defenders to throw at people like SGA, Ant, Tatum, Brown, ect. 

Maxi, who has two years less on contract, would be the salary to take on Vando.  The real assets would be the two seconds.  If LAL does truly want to get off Vando, I don't know if they could get better for a player I'm not sure is healthy himself.

34 year old Kyrie will never be a 6th man. Come on man. That's ridiculous. With the way pros take care of their bodies now, he'll still be great when he's 34 as long as he's healthy.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - RasheedsBigWhiteSpot - 05-31-2024

Did you know Hartenstein is black? Not kidding. As in the lightest skinned brother EVER!!!

Saw him discussing it on a podcast with Jalen Brunson and Josh Hart, and their reactions on the day they each found out. They suddenly started slapping hands with him differently.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - mvossman - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 04:45 PM)Luka77 Wrote: That team would be around for the next 5 years as they are all around Luka's timeline.  I think you spend the assets to get that done.  Moreover, those 3 players may only be a sixth man for the next two season.   After that time maybe a 34 y.o Kyrie will be okay with taking a back seat to become a sixth man.   Regardless, their desired role is something you talk about before the trade.  I'm thinking one of those guys would be willing to sacrifice to win a championship.

Also at what age did Dorian learn to shoot?  There was little evidence of him learning at 24 yo either.  I think it would worth taking a chance at bc the Mavs would have four 6'6 to 6'8 defenders to throw at people like SGA, Ant, Tatum, Brown, ect. 

Maxi, who has two years less on contract, would be the salary to take on Vando.  The real assets would be the two seconds.  If LAL does truly want to get off Vando, I don't know if they could get better for a player I'm not sure is healthy himself.

I don't think its common for a young really good offensive player to be interested in moving into a situation where he will be third fiddle and coming off the bench and might be able to crack the starting lineup after two years.  Some vets who have been around the block might think like that, but very few of the young guys do.  Those players need to look at their long term value too.  I'm sure they saw how Brunson value exploded once he got out from under Luka shadow.  I think you are asking/assuming a lot for them to be ok to come here and play from the bench.

Dorian is a single example of a player greatly improving their three point shooting.  How many have tried and failed.  I don't think the odds are in Vanderbilts favor.  They are different type players anyways.  A big part of Dorian's offensive game was the 3 (he just wasn't very good at it).  He took 5 threes per 36 right out of the gate.  In 6 seasons Vanderbilt hasn't taken much more than one 3 per 36.

I think we need to be real careful with assuming/expecting players to improve in areas just because we have seen it happen before.  Dorian improving is three is not likely to mean Vanderbilt will, just like PJ playing much better defense here is not likely to turn Simons into a decent defender.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Luka77 - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 05:30 PM)mvossman Wrote: I don't think its common for a young really good offensive player to be interested in moving into a situation where he will be third fiddle and coming off the bench and might be able to crack the starting lineup after two years.  Some vets who have been around the block might think like that, but very few of the young guys do.  Those players need to look at their long term value too.  I'm sure they saw how Brunson value exploded once he got out from under Luka shadow.  I think you are asking/assuming a lot for them to be ok to come here and play from the bench.

Dorian is a single example of a player greatly improving their three point shooting.  How many have tried and failed.  I don't think the odds are in Vanderbilts favor.  They are different type players anyways.  A big part of Dorian's offensive game was the 3 (he just wasn't very good at it).  He took 5 threes per 36 right out of the gate.  In 6 seasons Vanderbilt hasn't taken much more than one 3 per 36.

I think we need to be real careful with assuming/expecting players to improve in areas just because we have seen it happen before.  Dorian improving is three is not likely to mean Vanderbilt will, just like PJ playing much better defense here is not likely to turn Simons into a decent defender.

It may not be common but that doesn't mean it can't happen.  Most young guys don't want to come off the bench because it will affect their salary or they lose minutes.  In Simons case he already has his contract and he would not get less minutes.  And like I said Simon shares the same agent as Luka so I am sure he would know at all times his value to the Mavs

Moreover, our very own Jason Terry was a starter in Atlanta and Dallas and then came off the bench to win an NBA championship.  Manu Ginobili (a hall of famer)came off the bench to win a championship. There have been many people through out history that were successful players as starters that then came off the bench to win championship.  Only players with big ego's (Carmelo, Iverson) recently have resisted or been angry when asked to take a bench role.  

Moreover DFS wasn't shooting 5 threes out the gate, he wasn't even shooting 5 shoots total.  It wasn't until DFS was 27y.o that he was shooting 5 threes a game.   Moreover the three wasn't a big part of DFS game coming the league (at 23 y.o) it was by design that they forced him into shooting more threes.  

Also, DFS isn't the only player that increased his three point shooting as they got older.  Maxi was shooting .311 from 3 at 26 y.o taking less than 2 a game.  Only when he was 27 y.o did he start making them at league average of .35 at three a game.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Luka77 - 05-31-2024

I just saw that you were using per 36 stats still doesn't change my post much


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - mvossman - 05-31-2024

(05-31-2024, 09:52 PM)Luka77 Wrote: It may not be common but that doesn't mean it can't happen.  Most young guys don't want to come off the bench because it will affect their salary or they lose minutes.  In Simons case he already has his contract and he would not get less minutes.  And like I said Simon shares the same agent as Luka so I am sure he would know at all times his value to the Mavs

Moreover, our very own Jason Terry was a starter in Atlanta and Dallas and then came off the bench to win an NBA championship.  Manu Ginobili (a hall of famer)came off the bench to win a championship. There have been many people through out history that were successful players as starters that then came off the bench to win championship.  Only players with big ego's (Carmelo, Iverson) recently have resisted or been angry when asked to take a bench role.  

Moreover DFS wasn't shooting 5 threes out the gate, he wasn't even shooting 5 shoots total.  It wasn't until DFS was 27y.o that he was shooting 5 threes a game.   Moreover the three wasn't a big part of DFS game coming the league (at 23 y.o) it was by design that they forced him into shooting more threes.  

Also, DFS isn't the only player that increased his three point shooting as they got older.  Maxi was shooting .311 from 3 at 26 y.o taking less than 2 a game.  Only when he was 27 y.o did he start making them at league average of .35 at three a game.

Terry was in his 30s when he started coming off the bench, which is about when guys start thinking about doing that, not at 24.

You are going to find multiple examples of guys who increased their 3 point shooting significantly.  You will a lot more examples of guys who didn't.  The first list gets smaller when you talk about guys that never shoot more than one three per 36, and my guess is its even smaller when that guy has never shot better than 70% FTs.

Another point to bring up is that your trade for Simons (which probably needs more assets going out) makes it very unlikely we will be able to retain DJJ.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Branduil - 06-01-2024

I don't think the Mavs need any urgency to add new pieces this offseason. The main task is going to be to move off THJ's salary so they can keep DJJ.

As disappointing as Exum has been in the playoffs, Hardy has really shown something. I'd like to see him have the opportunity to take the 6th man role off the bench next season. Similarly, PJ and Gafford will have a full offseason to integrate into the offense.

And I think we still can't fully appreciate the potential for Lively. Even if his defense can't improve much from its already very high level, there's a lot he can improve on in offense. Not just free throws, but if he can start shooting threes, it will unlock a new level for the offense. It would be the 5-out AND lob threat we always hoped for with KP, but never really delivered.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Dundalis - 06-01-2024

(05-31-2024, 02:40 PM)Luka77 Wrote: My Mavs offseason
1. 6th man-Simons (White/Sexton), for THJ, Powell, Hardy, '25 first.  I may reconsider this based off of Hardy's readiness and production in the finals.

2. SF/PF-Vanderbilt for Maxi, 2 second round picks.  Mavs get younger and more offensively versatile player if he learns to shoot.

Kyrie/Simons
Luka/Green
DJJ/Omax
PJW/Vanderbilt
Gafford/Lively

That squad has multi year championship window.
I hate the almost complete lack of shooting outside your primary initiators/scorers. I get that it's working to an extent right now because of the insane gravity of Luka and Kyrie giving guys absolute wide open looks, but long term it's simply not ideal to have your primary initiators surrounded predominantly by guys who cannot even shoot league avg from 3.

We need another actual 3 and D guy (who actually does both the 3 and the D) as our next primary target IMO, ideally someone good enough to relegate PJ or DJJ to the bench to increase our depth if at all possible. Some of these other young teams in the west that already have insane talent and depth and also have tradeable assets coming out the wazoo scare me a bit moving forward. Having a player like Luka can elevate guys in ways 99% of other teams can't, but I'd rather look to resolve that issue sooner than later. We have a chance in the Finals because we have Luka, but looking at how much better Boston's role players are than ours is kind of eye opening. I could see some of these other teams in the west developing similar insane depth of talent quite soon.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - BigDirk41 - 06-01-2024

I see zero reason for DJJ or PJ to be moved to the bench next year. Both have been great this season and in the playoffs. Both players have shot higher 3 point percentages in the playoffs than in the regular season. Both players increased their ppg in the playoffs also. That's exactly what you want from your role players is to elevate their games when it matters the most. Hardy and Maxi have also raised their 3 point %. The only need for this team is the right type of role players to add to the team or possibly a 6th man if we don't think Hardy is ready for that role. I personally think Hardy is ready for that role. It's more about retaining all our top talent and improving if there is a chance.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - mvossman - 06-01-2024

(06-01-2024, 12:05 AM)Branduil Wrote: I don't think the Mavs need any urgency to add new pieces this offseason. The main task is going to be to move off THJ's salary so they can keep DJJ.

As disappointing as Exum has been in the playoffs, Hardy has really shown something. I'd like to see him have the opportunity to take the 6th man role off the bench next season. Similarly, PJ and Gafford will have a full offseason to integrate into the offense.

And I think we still can't fully appreciate the potential for Lively. Even if his defense can't improve much from its already very high level, there's a lot he can improve on in offense. Not just free throws, but if he can start shooting threes, it will unlock a new level for the offense. It would be the 5-out AND lob threat we always hoped for with KP, but never really delivered
I’m not ready to give up on Exum yet either. He did some really good things for us during the regular season. Brunson struggled his first playoffs as well, and I’m not sure there isn’t still an injury issue. Would like to see what both Hardy and Exum can do next season


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - Dundalis - 06-01-2024

(06-01-2024, 09:43 AM)BigDirk41 Wrote: I see zero reason for DJJ or PJ to be moved to the bench next year. Both have been great this season and in the playoffs. Both players have shot higher 3 point percentages in the playoffs than in the regular season. Both players increased their ppg in the playoffs also. That's exactly what you want from your role players is to elevate their games when it matters the most. Hardy and Maxi  have also raised their 3 point %. The only need for this team is the right type of role players to add to the team or possibly a 6th man if we don't think Hardy is ready for that role. I personally think Hardy is ready for that role. It's more about retaining all our top talent and improving if there is a chance.

You move DJJ or PJ to the bench because you have acquired superior talent. You don't move them for the sake of moving them. The Mavs looking to just stay pat is simply not understanding the way the league will move on without you, no matter what you've previously accomplished. Plenty of great teams have stood pat after success only to be left behind. I don't care that DJJ and PJ have elevated their games in the playoffs, because Luka literally elevates almost everyone in the playoffs, because his gravity increases in the playoffs as defenses key in on him more than in the regular season, leaving even more open space for these roles players than they are used to having. My thoughts go to what if Luka actually had good shooters around him during these periods, how good the offense would be. A Herb Jones type would prob be shooting 50% from 3 in these playoffs next to Luka and Kyrie because he'd be so consistently wide open. I recognize that as much as some of these role players deserve credit, a lot of what they are doing is purely due to Luka and Kyrie. They are team elevators of the highest order. Luka has the best team around him he's ever had, but IMO that's a very low bar when you look at what Tatum or Jokic or Giannis have had. Now finding the right players might be difficult, and high level 3 and D's aren't easy to get, but we should very much be on the lookout for any opportunity IMO. And to be clear I'm not saying this because I think PJ or DJJ aren't good. But I'm looking to have this team keep up with or keep ahead of a bunch of teams that are likely gonna be much better moving forward.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: PHX Wants Lebron+Bronny| Hawks to Shop Hunter - SleepingHero - 06-01-2024

(05-31-2024, 12:38 PM)dirkfansince1998 Wrote: Not sure. If they want to keep their core together they have to think about the extensions of their rookie contracts. A big 1-2 year deal wouldn't hurt but any additional year would really hurt their chances to resign their own guys.

But OKC needs big contracts for potential trades. As long as they want to keep their core of SGA/Chet/JDub/Dort that is. 

They have enough picks they can attach that even for a borderline ridiculous overpay for a guy, that contract is still moveable.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: PHX Wants Lebron+Bronny| Hawks to Shop Hunter - SleepingHero - 06-01-2024

(05-31-2024, 12:47 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: So, to me, it’s a hard target to hit. A guy who can play as a traditional big for extended minutes, but doesn’t expect the starting job to be gifted to him upon arrival. Ironically, I think Gafford might’ve been a better fit for them than the Mavericks. but, most of the names we know aren’t going to want to play third big minutes. After the year he just had, I would put Hartenstein on that list of people I would expect to be less than thrilled to go experiment in OKC.


Love love your breakdown. Agree with much of it. 

But that supposed target you're suggesting, a traditional big that is good enough for extended minutes, but doesn't expect a starting job, is there even a guy in the league right now that fits that? Nurkic, Valanciunas, maybe a return of Steven Adams? 

SGA/J-Dub/Dort/----/Chet is their lineup currently. I assume they are moving Giddey. To me they need a backup 5 and a starting 4 that is not only mobile, but has size and can hit 3s. I think basically everyone is looking for that. Maybe OKC throws a boatload of picks to HOU for Adams+Jabari Smith Jr....


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - SleepingHero - 06-01-2024

Evan Sidery (@esidery)
The Bulls’ asking price for Zach LaVine has dropped significantly, per @KCJHoop (https://www.nbcsportschicago.com/nba/chicago-bulls/bulls-analysis/bulls-mailbag-zach-lavine-trade-market-draft-targets/565962/).

Both sides have increased desires on making a trade happen this offseason.

With LaVine’s market barely materializing, it appears Chicago might be willing to simply perform a salary dump deal.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Lavine Market Barely There; Bulls Ready To Move on - SleepingHero - 06-01-2024

Evan Sidery (@esidery)
The Kings intend to shop the No. 13 overall pick along with future draft capital to aggressively hunt a win-now piece.

Harrison Barnes and Kevin Huerter are two players who will likely be dangled in trade talks over the next month.

Sacramento wants to seriously compete within the midst of De’Aaron Fox and Domantas Sabonis’ prime years.


RE: Trade & FA 2023-24: Hartenstein to get 100M?| Cavs Want to Keep Core 4? - omahen - 06-01-2024

(06-01-2024, 10:07 AM)mvossman Wrote: I’m not ready to give up on Exum yet either. He did some really good things for us during the regular season. Brunson struggled his first playoffs as well, and I’m not sure there isn’t still an injury issue. Would like to see what both Hardy and Exum can do next season

I hope Exum can recover, but I would not bet next season on him. He came back from injury on February 28th...

I think first priority is to resign DJJ, than build from there, depending how much will it take to resign him and what assets and salary will be left.