DAL OFFSEASON: Trade & FA | Mavs "mostly done...but you never know." - Printable Version +- MavsBoard (https://www.mavsboard.com) +-- Forum: Boards (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=1) +--- Forum: Dallas Mavericks and the NBA (https://www.mavsboard.com/forumdisplay.php?fid=2) +--- Thread: DAL OFFSEASON: Trade & FA | Mavs "mostly done...but you never know." (/showthread.php?tid=565) Pages:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342
343
344
345
346
347
348
349
350
351
352
353
354
355
356
357
358
359
360
361
362
363
364
365
366
367
368
369
370
371
372
373
374
375
376
377
378
379
380
381
382
383
384
385
386
387
388
389
390
391
392
393
394
395
396
397
398
399
400
401
402
403
404
405
406
407
408
409
410
411
412
|
RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - KillerLeft - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 12:40 PM)jesusshuttlesworth82 Wrote: has this Hawks "insider" accurately predicted any other moves? He's not an insider, but he seems to know one. Honestly, no moves of any kind have happened since we discovered him, and he hasn't "predicted" anything. He's just relaying info that he's hearing about what teams are TRYING to accomplish. Almost all of it has made a lot of sense to me, so far. I'm not saying Hayward is going to happen, just that it is something that makes sense as far as a Mavericks target. It also makes sense that he'd want to play here, especially since we don't know the numbers involved. As soon as one wraps their head around the idea that the goal is to sign and trade him (so in other words, NOT bring him in for one year only) then a lot of other tumblers fall into place.
If they don't want him back, Dallas would have to be willing to pay him enough, whatever that is, to get him to sign for 3-4 years. MAYBE this means paying him MORE than what any other team is willing to offer, but maybe not. Maybe he has Dallas on a list of 2-3 teams he'd prefer, and there are other factors involved. So, Dallas might only be competing with a few other teams, not the whole league. Indiana is likely a competitor, for example, but they're not idiots. I would think they'd have a top price in mind, too. A team like Charlotte (just an example) might throw a max at him just to try to sell tickets, but he'd still have to want to play there. He seems to be a smart dude. Then, you throw in @"Tyler"'s interesting thought that they might be willing to take a step back overall for next year to get it done in order to maintain some level of flexibility...not entirely convinced their interest would hinge on that, but it sure is interesting, and I can see cheap/helpful guys like Curry/DFS/Kleber/Boban/WCS looking pretty damn good to Boston for the simple task of letting a player sign elsewhere. This is one of the rare things we talk about that seems to make MORE sense the longer I think about it. Not sure this specific thing will happen, but THIS is the level of deal I've been hoping for these past months. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - StepBackJay - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 12:18 PM)Kammrath Wrote:(10-28-2020, 11:59 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: Remember y'all if 33 yr old Horford can get a 100 million dollars last year Okay but the cap is flat from last year right, it didn't go down? If there is cap space teams will spend it. Ask NYK. (10-28-2020, 12:23 PM)KillerLeft Wrote:(10-28-2020, 11:59 AM)StepBackJay Wrote: If Gordon Hayward opts out then this doesn't really matter. I imagine he goes to a team willing to pay him a big pile of money. So I think you would need Gordon communicating that he is opting out and thus having leverage over the Celtics. If he opts in he has no leverage really. If he opts out and wants to play for Dallas then I guess Dallas could see if they could negotiate a deal with the Celtics that they like better than just getting cap back for Hayward. In that scenario a THJ/Maxi package could look better than just cap savings which have no real benefit for them this year anyway. I like Hayward as a player, I wouldn't want to give up Maxi though. I do think he's an upgrade over THJ but not such an upgrade that I'd want to give him a big contract and give up pieces to get him. I still like plan Home-Dipo the best. I think Mavs have the ammunition to get him and he's a good fit on this team. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - ClutchDirk - 10-28-2020 https://twitter.com/DimeUPROXX/status/1321519857855320067 RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - KillerLeft - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 01:23 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: So I think you would need Gordon communicating that he is opting out and thus having leverage over the Celtics. If he opts in he has no leverage really. If he opts out and wants to play for Dallas then I guess Dallas could see if they could negotiate a deal with the Celtics that they like better than just getting cap back for Hayward. In that scenario a THJ/Maxi package could look better than just cap savings which have no real benefit for them this year anyway. So this is part of the "leverage" picture, but not all of it. What if:
I'm telling you, IF Dallas is willing to pay him more than Boston and he WANTS to play here, there's a decent chance this could be a fit between all three parties. All we know for absolute certain is that the deal would have to be more than $34 million TOTAL, otherwise he'd just opt in. No brainer. I'd think it would have to quite a bit more, tbh. Three years at $20 million per? Total speculation, but I can understand how Dallas would pay that and Boston wouldn't. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - ClutchDirk - 10-28-2020 https://twitter.com/ChrisBHaynes/status/1321527387759079424 https://twitter.com/wojespn/status/1321534246373232642 RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - StepBackJay - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 01:52 PM)KillerLeft Wrote:(10-28-2020, 01:23 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: So I think you would need Gordon communicating that he is opting out and thus having leverage over the Celtics. If he opts in he has no leverage really. If he opts out and wants to play for Dallas then I guess Dallas could see if they could negotiate a deal with the Celtics that they like better than just getting cap back for Hayward. In that scenario a THJ/Maxi package could look better than just cap savings which have no real benefit for them this year anyway. Right as I said he has leverage if he is opting out and none if he is opting in. I don't know why he'd give up 14 mil in that first year. sure he would make more for the length of the contract but people tend to overestimate how much of a discount these guys are willing to give up in order to get more guaranteed years. I doubt he would go from 34 in 2020 to 20. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - KillerLeft - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 02:40 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: Right as I said he has leverage if he is opting out and none if he is opting in. I don't know why he'd give up 14 mil in that first year. sure he would make more for the length of the contract but people tend to overestimate how much of a discount these guys are willing to give up in order to get more guaranteed years. I doubt he would go from 34 in 2020 to 20. There's some truth to this. I was just throwing the $60 million total out, as it's almost twice as much guaranteed money as he has now, but it might not be enough. I think you're overlooking the potential other factors, such as him having his choice of where he wants to play. But, let me get this out of the way: The people who are wondering whether Hayward is a fit here right now will HATE this, if it happens, because it's probably going to be a bigger contract than what we're imagining. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - cow - 10-28-2020 Does Boston have heart and send Hayward where he wants to go due to the Stevens relationship? Does Ainge feel like he owes us a solid? What's the least we can pay for Hayward. I don't think Boston is going to be interested in our draft picks. I don't really like the idea of giving up both Curry and Maxi. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - ClutchDirk - 10-28-2020 https://twitter.com/KevinOConnorNBA/status/1321550839681568768 Bobby Marks of ESPN: Quote:The teams I’ve talked to have said that the cap will be no lower than 109. That is what they’ve been assured. It will be no lower than 109. It could be 111. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - StepBackJay - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 02:50 PM)KillerLeft Wrote:(10-28-2020, 02:40 PM)StepBackJay Wrote: Right as I said he has leverage if he is opting out and none if he is opting in. I don't know why he'd give up 14 mil in that first year. sure he would make more for the length of the contract but people tend to overestimate how much of a discount these guys are willing to give up in order to get more guaranteed years. I doubt he would go from 34 in 2020 to 20. Ya'll can show me some examples where someone gave up a lot of year 1 guaranteed money to get years added on. I don't recall seeing that scenario play out. People thought Barnes would take a big paycut for more guaranteed years and it didn't happen. I think his opt-in dollars and first year deal with the Kings were very close (maybe the same?). Why give up that guaranteed money? Players generally just play out that last year then worry ab their next contract next year. As it relates to Hayward, would he take a haircut in year one for a 100+ million dollar deal? Maybe so but it's not going to be a big drop. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - KillerLeft - 10-28-2020 @"StepBackJay" If the agent believes an opportunity for a long term deal NOW is better than what the opportunity might be NEXT YEAR, for literally any reason (this is what was written that got us talking) then there's a number that would motivate him to make that choice. We don't know what that number is, and you might be right that it's A LOT. With his recent injury history, I can easily see Hayward adopting the security mindset (guaranteed total for years) over the "maximize each new eligibility milestone" method recently popularized by Lebron and Klutch. This was conventional wisdom up until about 10 years ago. Assume that he cares more about raising the "worst case scenario" floor of the next 3-5 years (total) than he cares about maximizing the financial potential of the 2020-2021 season, and it will make sense. If you're Lebron, you're right not to think that way. If you're Gordon Hayward, maybe not so much. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - Mavs2019 - 10-28-2020 I had to rest 48 hours just to find the strength to write an argument, why I want nothing to do with somebody, who is 30 years old, injury-prone, averaging 17/6/4 and would have to opt out of a 34M dollar contract. Oh also Danny Ainge. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - KillerLeft - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 06:26 PM)Mavs2019 Wrote: I had to rest 48 hours just to find the strength to write an argument, why I want nothing to do with somebody, who is 30 years old, injury-prone, averaging 17/6/4 and would have to opt out of a 34M dollar contract. Oh also Danny Ainge. Lol. Definitely an accurate portrayal of all the negatives involved. I can't say the above isn't valid. But, idk...I just think his game fits into this situation so well. But, yes, the injuries have to be considered. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - DanSchwartzgan - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 01:52 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: What if: I think you have the leverage equation right. It doesn't have to be Dallas that poses the credible threat. It can be anyone. I think we generally know the S&T rules. Another way of doing this that isn't well known is an E&T (extend and trade). Hayward would opt in with the understanding Boston would extend him and trade him to Dallas once the new season started. Extend and Trades have to be 3 years...so 20/21 would be for the current contract value and there would be two more years negotiated between Dallas and Hayward. It is good for the player in that he keeps his guaranteed money. It is good for Dallas in that they get to determine what they are willing to pay in 21 and 22 (Luka's last cheap year). One issue with doing a deal after 19/20 turns to 20/21 is THJ/Maxi misses the match by about $49k. Maybe Boston (or a third team) would take THJ/Wright and send Boston the center they want. Remember, Boston has draft capital to help smooth any deal with a third team. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - ClutchDirk - 10-28-2020 https://abcnews.go.com/amp/Sports/nba-revenue-2019-20-season-dropped-10-83/story?id=73886875 RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - DanSchwartzgan - 10-28-2020 https://www.masslive.com/celtics/2020/10/gordon-hayward-rumors-hes-doing-the-al-horford-plan-something-is-mildly-afoot-here-per-espns-lowe-post-podcast.html RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - ClutchDirk - 10-28-2020 https://twitter.com/dallasmavs/status/1321575581222342658 Advertising trade assets?... https://media.giphy.com/media/xTcf1gUpg87E5lNK2A/giphy.gif RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - KillerLeft - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 08:37 PM)DanSchwartzman Wrote: https://www.masslive.com/celtics/2020/10/gordon-hayward-rumors-hes-doing-the-al-horford-plan-something-is-mildly-afoot-here-per-espns-lowe-post-podcast.html I thought about the Indiana rumors while we were discussing this earlier. Hollinger said in a podcast a while back that all of the info in the press gets leaked from either the team or agents. He said when TEAMS do it, 99% of the time it's false, designed to get another team worried about their target disappearing. It's meant to motivate them to hand over that last 2nd round pick, soften up the protections of a 1st rounder that's changing hands, whatever. It's designed to get a deal over the finish line. In this scenario that's happening now, it's clear that someone is trying to influence someone else in regards to Hayward. Not sure if the Indiana rumors are leaking to push Dallas, or vice versa, but I think Lowe is right about there being something going on. RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - ClutchDirk - 10-28-2020 https://twitter.com/ShamsCharania/status/1321627231433576453 RE: OFFSEASON: Mavs Trade & FA (Nov 21?) + Salary Chart | Season (Dec 22? 72 gms?) - Kammrath - 10-28-2020 (10-28-2020, 08:44 PM)KillerLeft Wrote: Not sure if the Indiana rumors are leaking to push Dallas, or vice versa, but I think Lowe is right about there being something going on. Or BOTH are to push BOS up in an offer or extension? |